Parties that condemn and reject nativists sometimes pay short-term electoral costs but are able to keep nativists from taking over their policy agenda.Changing the subject to economic issues or other topics does not seem to work as well as addressing nativism directly.Nativists then either take over the establishment party or beat it in elections. ![]() Instead, they tend to absorb the nativists’ views. Mainstream parties that embrace or collaborate with nativists often believe they can temper nativist preferences.Though currently congregating in conservative parties globally, nativists’ preference for redistributive economics that are restricted to their preferred group make them “swing” voters who may vote for candidates on the left or right. ![]() Nativists can be found on both sides of the political spectrum. ![]() As nativist voters flex their muscle, what can political parties on both sides of the aisle do to put the genie back in the bottle? Examining how Austria, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and Italy have addressed nativism in their politics offers some useful lessons.Ĭase studies of these countries’ experiences indicate that: Yet nativism is inherently undemocratic because nativists demote citizens who have the “wrong” characteristics to, at best, second-class citizenship. This tendency to define nationhood not by values or laws but in racial, ethnic, or religious terms is not new. Nativism has once again gained momentum in U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |